GRM 2010 GRM 2011

WORKSHOP DETAILS

Title: The Arab Spring: Impacts and Consequences on the GCC

Workshop Directors:

Dr. Khawla Mohammed Mattar
Director of UN Information Centre in Cairo, 1 Osoris St. Garden City
Email: khawla.mattar@gmail.com
         khawla.mattar@unic-eg.or
Dr. May Seikaly
Department of CMLLC WayneStateUniversity 427 Manoogian Hall
Email: ad6006@wayne.edu
         mayseikaly@gmail.com

Abstract

The Arab uprisings of the spring of 2011 have impacted the entire Arab World in addition to generating reverberations worldwide.[1] This workshop will try to study the impact of the uprisings on the Gulf States. It will try to describe how slogans such as “the people demand,” or “the people want” echoed in the oil-rich Gulf countries. While the youth, women and men in a number of Arab capitals and cities demanded social justice, what they summarize as their ‘dignity’ was also the demand of their counterparts in the Gulf countries with high per capita incomes.

The Gulf citizens, like the citizens of other Arab countries, were energized as in the other Arab countries by this new peaceful phenomenon. In its essence and for all Arabs,the events represented a desperate call for social justice, equality, transparency and participation. They dramatically unveiled the divide that has pitted the rulers against the ruled, powerful against the powerless – facts recognized by all the parties on the scene. Such facts established themselves on the consciousness of the people with their constant demand for freedom and transition to democracy, a democracy to be carved with tools that come from Arab culture itself and by the Arab people for themselves.

The Arab Spring though has not yet produced the newly democratic states the people have called and fought for peacefully. However, certain facts have been established as realities on the Arab scene and have set indicators for the future. For one, these events have awakened Arab governments to heed the currents of change and reform and to find means and forms of solutions or suppression.2 Similarly, governments and societies of the Gulf have been impacted by these events and had to devise means and methods to deal with them in the short term. Events have overtaken these governments where the ruling arrangements between rulers and citizens as a trade-off of economic wealth for political power have become questionable and unacceptable on the whole. At the same time to assure legitimacy and loyalty, the ruling establishments are pressed to meet repercussions and to walk in parallel with developments in the region. 

 

Description and Rationale

In this workshop, Gulf reactions to the Arab Spring will be presented with an eye to analyzing their impacts on the social, economic and particularly political arenas of the various states. On the one hand, the impact of political turmoil and challenge has reaffirmed various popular demands and projects for reform; at the same time it has also exposed the more reactionary tendencies and irreconcilable knots in the governance systems of the region. The paradox facing the relationship between the ruling institutions in the Gulf and its citizens should engage a major section of the panel and be viewed from many angles. While various measures were implemented to mute the protests and to dilute its angst, such as monetary stopgaps in the wealthier states, strong and almost unprecedented repressive measures were also undertaken exposing inherent problems and gaps between the people and the ruling institutions.

It should be recognized that increasingly, in the last decade, the Gulf governments have become significant partners and agents in the globalizing policies in theGulf societies, policies that claim ethical and social codes of justice and equality. Also it cannot be denied that these Gulf States and their ruling families have been, to a certain degree, successful in using their resources to instill stability, acceptance, forms of loyalty and have incrementally shown promise of modern state formation; at the same time they have also persisted in maintaining policies based on tribal, nepotistic and patronage ethos as the basis of political management. On the regional levels, these ruling tribal families have led their countries to be viewed as hubs of modern, liberalizing developments by attracting Ivy League universities, world-renowned museums, centers of commercial and business exhibits, and their leaders have acted as brokers and financiers in resolving Arab and international problems. Nevertheless, when it comes to the domain of equality in governance, sharing of power, women’s rights as well as overall human rights for all residents, this has often been seen both locally and by the international analysts as lacking. Therefore, at these times of popular uprisings in the region, or at least faced with the model of such uprisings in neighboring and brotherly Arab states, the Gulf governments have to face the resulting paradoxes and intensified dilemmas of the dual influences and messages of their rule.

Furthermore, the economic and political dynamics of this challenge leads to inquiries into the development of the modern Gulf nation state, the non-rentier nature of its evolution and the emphasis on identification of muwatana (citizenry) going beyond sectarian and ethnic divides. The economic impact of these uprisings and its effect on the social and cultural future of the Gulf people is another discussion hub of the workshop. On this issue, the panel aims toanalyze the ability and the willingness of the governments and people to overcome the obstacles of ethnic and sectarian strife and divides and to find solutions to theresultant bitterness. Examples of the dilemma are represented in most Gulf States and they should be framed within the international theoretical basis of conflict resolution and human rights.

Another prism to this discussion should consider the role of social and cultural frames (used and abused, often through the media) that feed the imagination of all parties in response to the challenge. In this panel, narratives that speak to these experiences and their significance in terms of the national dialogues will be encouraged and sought. The proposal is to review the role the traditional and social media have played during these uprisings with a view to answering the major questions: “Did the media report the event or create it? Was it a mirror that reflected what happened or was it ‘cheerleading’ the events?” This will be discussed against the background related to the ownership of the major regional television networks and daily newspapers. During recent history, the media has been totally controlled and owned by Gulf media tycoons. Some of them are directly or indirectly related to the ruling families. Such ownership will be examined to determine coverage of these events and the impact of such coverage on the viewers in the Gulf and the Arab region as a whole.

Thus this workshop presumes that the environment and repercussions of the Arab Spring has brought forth challenges that has left a trail of unanswered questions vis-a-vis the GCC countries and that participants in the workshop would aim to investigate the mentioned issues within an interdisciplinary approach and comprehensively cover the three topics listed below.

 

Anticipated Papers

1.  Democracy and the politics of participation - under this could fall the issues of:

    a.       Elected and appointed Councils (Majlis Shura- elections and manipulations?)

    b.      Paradox of Power sharing: The scope and significance of sources of power (soft and coercive)

    c.       The tribe and the citizen/ Tribe and the State/Sectarianism as a dividing tool

   d.      Women: Are they active participants or agents of power? Issues of empowerment or the lack of empowerment.

2. Voices of Society and Reactions of the State:

    a.       Media: What/whom does it serve and how?

    b.      Social media and the new outlets of freedom

    c.       The parameters of power and the citizen: Narratives from the people

    d.      The voice of sectarianism and ethno-centrism as reflected in the uprisings

3. Culture, Identity and the State

    a.      Symbolism and the fabrication of identity

    b.      Sectarianism and ethnic identity politics

    c.      Museums: Sites of power and history

 

Workshop Director Profiles

Dr. May Seikaly is Associate Professor in Near Eastern Studies at Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan. She received her Ph.D. from Oxford University and her M.A. from UCLA. Dr. Seikaly has taught history at Bahrain University and at UCLA prior to her current position. She is the author of Haifa: Transformation of an Arab Society 1918-1939 (I.B. Tauris, UK 1995/2000) translated into Arabic as Haifa al-Arabiyya 1918-1939(Beirut 1997). In addition to articles on Palestinian issues, Dr. Seikaly has published on women’s political roles, particularly in the Arab Gulf. She has served on the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Middle East Studies, the Wayne State University Press Committee, the editorial committee of the Journal of Palestine Studies, the Albert Hourani Award Committee, and on the Task force for the Arab American Museum in Detroit. For several years, Dr. Seikaly has been involved in the collection and archiving of Arab memory through the use of oral documentation. Her current research is a study of women as agents of change in the Arabian Gulf using oral history as the tool of her research.

Dr. Khawla Mattar is the Director of the United Nations Information Center in Cairo since February 2010. She received her Ph.D. and her M.A. in Sociology of the Media from the University of Durham (UK). Dr. Mattar started her career as a reporter, editor and photo editor with different media outlets. Though much of her media experience has been in the Arabian Gulf, she has worked for regional and international media organizations such as the Associated Press and the BBC Television. She moved to the International Labor Organization in 1996 where she took the post of Regional Information Officer. Since then she has managed to promote issues related to basic rights at work focusing on migrant workers, women empowerment and involvement in the labor market, combating child labor, promoting human rights at work. In 2005-2006, she took a sabbatical and, together with a number of prominent journalists, established  Al Waqt, a daily newspaper in Bahrain; she was appointed editor-in-chief of the paper, the first woman to hold that position in the country. That same year she managed to cover the Israeli war on Lebanon and later published the book Beirut under Siege: The Israeli War on Lebanon in 2006 (Riad Al Rias Publishing, Beirut 2006). She has contributed a chapter to the edited volumeTriumph of the Image: The Gulf War(1993). Dr. Mattar has published papers on the image of women in the media and on migrant workers in the Gulf States. She has been one of the very few women of her time to cover conflicts and wars such as the Iraq-Iran War, the civil war in Lebanon, civil war in South Yemen (in 1996 before the unification of the country), and the Bosnian war.

 

Selected Readings

Al-Naqeeb, Khaldoun H., Society and State in the Gulf and the Arab Peninsula, (Routledge, 1990).

Alsharekh, Alanoudand Robert Springborg, (eds.). Popular Culture and Political Identity in the Arab Gulf States. Saqi Books, 2008.

Council on Foreign Affairs, (ed.) The New Arab Revolt: What Happened, What it Means and What Comes Next.USA, 2011.

Fox, John W., N. Mourtada-Sabbah, and Mohammed Al-Mutawa (eds.), Globalization and the Gulf. Routledge, 2006.

Kraidy, Marwan and Joe F. Khalil.Arab Television Industries.London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.

Rabab El-Mahdi, Rabab and Philip Marfleet (ed.)Egypt: The Moment of Change.Zed Books, 2009.

Rugh, Andrea B.The Political Culture of Leadership in the United Arab EmiratesPalgrave, 2007.

Sakr, Naomi. Arab TV Today. London: I.B.Tauris, 2007.

 

Western and Middle East think-tanks with various entries:

Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, various entries:

http://carnegieendowment.org

Jadaliyya: http://www.jadaliyya.com/

International Crisis Group: http://www.crisisgroup.org/en.aspx

 

Newspapers:

· The Independent with various articles by Robert Fisk

· The New York Times, The Washington Post, Counterpunch etc.

· “Social Media and the Arab Spring: What Have We Learned?” Raymond Schillinger, Huffington Post, October 19, 2011.

· “Analysis: Saudi Media Bypass Structure rules after Arab Spring,” Reuters.

· “Arab Spring 'Revolutions Fail to Provide Greater Press Freedom,”The Guardian, October 13, 2011.

· “Social Media and the New Arab Spring,” Hansand Society.

· “Why the Arab Spring Was the Best and Worst Thing to Happen to Al Jazeera,” Philli Seib, Foreign Affairs, CNN World.

 

TV and internet:

AL-Jazeera, Al-Arabiyya and BBC documentaries

http://www.babnet.net/

http://www.attounissia.com.tn/

For those who have access to Arabic publications, the use of local newspapers as well as those published in Europe is encouraged.

 

1 Al-Jazeera Arabic and English broadcasts as well as most other regional and international media channels have graphically shown slogans demanding participation and the power of the masses demanding reform and change. It can be easily stated that these slogans have become, to a large extent, familiar to TV-viewing households across the globe.
 
2 Western and international media from Wall Street Journal to The Nation, research centers such as the Carnegie Foundation and the International Crisis Group, as well as most local newspapers and magazines in the Arab and Muslim worlds have run various articles following the events and predicting their path.

 

 

 

WITH THE GENEROUS SUPPORT OF